Never Offline®   Internet Search Portal™   Atomic Time Zone™   Contact Us
  Home  |  News  |  Digital Media  |  Never Offline®  |        Sat Oct 18 2025 16:49:50 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)   Good Late Afternoon!
Never Offline®
Atomic Time Zone™
BrowserBuddy™
P5™ Software
Internet Search Portal™
New Technology (NT)
Press Relations
Digital Media Area
Windows Update
Download NOL™
Knowledge Base
Beta Team
Digital Media Area
Check your NET Speed
Shopping
Weather
New on the NET?
AMO Information
Tell Friends or Family
Press Releases
Investors and Microsoft
Advertise with Us







Microsoft seeks Supreme Court

  08/07/2001 9:30:03 PM MDT Albuquerque, Nm
  By Dustin D. Brand; Owner AMO


Just in time before August 12th, Microsoft asks for a Supreme Court ruling.
NOLers Minutes Online:
59186469650
New Fuel for the future... 12/30/2001 6:12:41 AM MST

Comcast to marry AT&T Broadband 12/21/2001 11:11:46 AM MST

What is ITS BIG Deal? 12/21/2001 10:55:13 AM MST

Not @Home with AT&T Broadband 12/09/2001 12:33:33 AM MST

Spray painted Linux 11/28/2001 6:28:52 AM MST

The bump in the road for Broadband. 11/28/2001 6:02:52 AM MST

Online Shoppers Beware the signs of Fraud 11/26/2001 5:18:47 AM MST

Microsoft XBOX gets LAUNCHED! 11/26/2001 4:33:35 AM MST

Intel sets Decade Plan 11/26/2001 3:57:48 AM MST

The Future of the Computer Chip 11/15/2001 4:30:56 AM MST

File swapping case may bring P5 into Court. 11/09/2001 12:45:08 AM MST

Linux isn't looking too well. 11/09/2001 12:37:33 AM MST

Microsoft case split 9/9. 11/07/2001 10:18:57 AM MST

IBM Pixie Dust on market now. 11/07/2001 9:44:33 AM MST

Microsoft closes in on Instant Messenging. 11/01/2001 9:49:08 AM MST

Did Microsoft block Web Browsers from MSN? 11/01/2001 9:21:47 AM MST

Netscape gets upgrade, just for Windows XP 11/01/2001 8:50:07 AM MST

Microsoft and Goverment near Settlement 11/01/2001 8:24:56 AM MST

We made Contact. - 09/05/2001 5:55:55 PM MDT

Never Offline(SM) v3.0 - Join the Global Beta Team!
  The schedule for the Microsoft Antitrust case being sent back to a lower court was August 12th. Microsoft is now seeking directly the Supreme Court to review the case.

  In the June 28 appeals court ruling, the appeals court upheld Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's findings that Microsoft was a predatory monopolist that had illegally squashed competition. The court however threw out Jackson's proposed remedy splitting the company in half while ordering a new district judge to revisit the issue.

  On Tuesday August 7th, Microsoft asked the Supreme Court to throw out Jackson's rulings in their entirety, including the damaging monopoly finding, because the judge had spoken to reporters while the case was ongoing. The company also asked the appeals court to postpone further lower-court proceedings until the Supreme Court either declined the case or issued a ruling a likely delay of months to a year or more. Delays should place Microsoft well past their release date of October 25th of Windows XP.

  The appeals court did remove Jackson from future proceedings, saying he had created an appearance of bias by talking to reporters from the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and other outlets during the trial. However, the appeals court said it found no evidence of actual bias and did not throw out the judge's factual and legal findings. This is where Microsoft intends to argue, that Jackson was indeed bias speaking to reporters about the case well before Jackson ruled on it.

  In the Microsoft petition for review, Microsoft argued that Jackson's conduct in such a high-profile case could undermine the public's view of the entire legal system. "The court's immediate review of the disqualification issue is also necessary to protect public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary," the company wrote.

  The Justice Department issued a short statement saying that the appeals court had already reviewed the bias issue, promising to "respond promptly" to Microsoft's plea.

  In its brief to the Supreme Court, Microsoft said it also might appeal other portions of the case to the high court, but probably not until the lower courts completed reconsidering the remaining issues.

  Related AMO Articles:
   Microsoft request for rehearing denied
   Microsoft may block AT&T-AOL Broadband
   InterTrust expands lawsuit against Microsoft
   New Mexico Settles with Microsoft
   Microsoft, another lawsuit filed.
   Microsoft Antitrust Case - NO BREAKUP
   Microsoft Antitrust case wrapped up
   Microsoft Antitrust case Appeal - Day One
   Windows XP = $1 Billion in Marketing
   AOL Time Warner takes on Passport?
   Could AOL Time Warner buy Amazon.com?
   Loudeye and AOL, it's a deal.
   AOL raises rates 9%
   AOL goes down HARD!
   AOL IM Service is down, twice this week!
   AOL IM Service is down, AGAIN!
   AOL IM Service is down!


Thanks for using Netscape Mozilla v5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)  
FeedBack: AMaestrO | AMOURLv5.5: http://amo.net/NT/08-07-01MSFT.html Sat Oct 18 2025 16:49:50 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)  
Copyright © America's Multimedia Online All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy